Involuntary medication of patients who are incompetent to stand trial: a descriptive study of the New York experience with judicial review.

نویسندگان

  • B Ladds
  • A Convit
  • J Zito
  • J Vitrai
چکیده

The United States Supreme Court, in the recent case of Riggins v. Nevada, extended its examination of the issue of involuntary treatment with antipsychotic medication to the mentally disabled facing criminal trial. A criminal defendant who is "incompetent to stand trial" cannot be subjected to trial. Many such persons are committed to hospitals to be treated and rendered "competent to stand trial," and some of these patients refuse medication. The involuntary administration of antipsychotic medication to such patients raises important and unique medical and moral questions. This highly controversial issue has been understudied. We report here on the first study of persons committed to a state hospital in order to be rendered competent to stand trial who refuse antipsychotic medication and for whom judicial review is requested to allow involuntary treatment, and in which results are given specifically for these subjects. This is a retrospective study to determine the characteristics of such cases and aspects of their outcome in the hospital. We reviewed all cases (N = 68) of application for treatment over objection, filed since the inception in 1986 of the new laws and regulations requiring judicial review through 1990, among patients in the two facilities that receive over 95 percent of all indicted felony offenders in New York State who are incompetent to stand trial. Tentative conclusions are formulated based on the findings that, according to clinical reports, no patient gave only rational reasons for medication refusal, clinicians always indicated the clinical appropriateness of the proposed treatment, judges apparently never found that someone who is "incompetent to stand trial" is "competent" to refuse medication, 93 percent of patients treated involuntarily had a good clinical response, and 87 percent of patients treated involuntarily were restored to "competency to stand trial."

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Involuntary medication of patients who are incompetent to stand trial: a review of empirical studies.

Involuntary administration of antipsychotic medication to pretrial criminal defendants raises important and controversial questions. These questions arise especially with defendants who have been adjudicated as incompetent to stand trial and who require medication to be restored to trial-competency and return to face their pending criminal charges. This subject has been fiercely debated for dec...

متن کامل

A comparison of clinical and judicial procedures for reviewing requests for involuntary medication in New York.

The Rivers v. Katz decision substituted judicial review for administrative review of requests for involuntary medication of patients in New York State mental hospitals. This change, prompted by concern for the rights of involuntarily committed patients, did not delay or diminish the use of involuntary medication in a large state hospital. Advantages of judicial review include a better understan...

متن کامل

Sell v. U.S.: involuntary medication to restore trial competency--a workable standard?

Competency to Stand Trial (CST) evaluations are common in the U.S. criminal justice system. Of those defendants found Incompetent to Stand Trial (IST), psychotic disorders are the most common diagnoses, and active psychotic symptoms are strongly correlated with impairments in trial-related abilities. If a defendant is rendered IST because of psychosis, restoration will be unlikely without antip...

متن کامل

Prevalence of Involuntary Hospital Admission Among Patients Referred by Judicial Authorities to A Psychiatric Hospital in Iran

Background: An important group of patients admitted to psychiatric hospitals are patients who are referred by court letters which deprive the physician of authority to make a decision, leading to involuntary hospital admission. One of the medical principles is to pay attention to patients' rights.  Objective: This study aims to investigate the prevalence of involuntary hospital admission in pa...

متن کامل

The involuntary medication of Jared Loughner and pretrial jail detainees in nonmedical correctional facilities.

In United States v. Loughner the Ninth Circuit will soon address the constitutionality of involuntarily medicating an incompetent pretrial defendant through a Harper order that could serve to render him competent to stand trial without the added procedural protection of a judicial hearing. Judicial support for applying Harper orders to pretrial defendants is likely to be used to justify Harper ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • The Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

دوره 21 4  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1993